- From: Brian Korver <briank@xythos.com>
- Date: Wed, 5 Mar 2003 14:35:07 -0800
- To: "'WebDAV'" <w3c-dist-auth@w3.org>
On Wednesday, March 5, 2003, at 01:48 PM, Brian Korver wrote: > On Wednesday, March 5, 2003, at 12:34 PM, Julian Reschke wrote: [snip] >> The same thing as the failure you'll get upon trying to rename. MOVE >> is >> *not* the same thing (or should not be the same thing) as >> COPY/DELETE. If a >> MOVE can't preserve the resource's live properties, it should fail. >> >> Now I *do* agree that in many cases clients will actually *want* the >> "weak" >> MOVE. So maybe we should consider supporting both (either by a new >> method, >> or by adding parameters to MOVE). > > That's an interesting idea. Julian, Were you thinking that this header (say "Atomic-Operation:") would be used for only MOVE, or for all of the relevant operations (COPY, DELETE, etc.)? -brian briank@xythos.com
Received on Wednesday, 5 March 2003 17:35:10 UTC