- From: Brian Korver <briank@xythos.com>
- Date: Tue, 4 Mar 2003 17:33:53 -0800
- To: WebDAV <w3c-dist-auth@w3.org>
On Tuesday, March 4, 2003, at 12:13 PM, Clemm, Geoff wrote: > The only argument for not doing so is that being more > specific probably requires including the entire GULP > document, since that is needed to clearly define the difference > between locking a resource and protecting a URL. > But I don't think we want to include that information by > copy in each protocol extension document, so I think it > is more appropriate to get it into 2518bis, and refer to > it from the other documents. > > Cheers, > Geoff Geoff, As GULP frequently defines things in terms of bindings, the text as-is seems more appropriate to the binding spec. -brian briank@xythos.com
Received on Tuesday, 4 March 2003 20:33:56 UTC