W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-dist-auth@w3.org > January to March 2003

RE: Bindings and Locks (was: bind draft issues)

From: Jason Crawford <nn683849@smallcue.com>
Date: Mon, 3 Mar 2003 16:00:42 -0500
To: "Clemm, Geoff" <gclemm@Rational.Com>
Cc: WebDAV <w3c-dist-auth@w3.org>
Message-ID: <OF98E84CD9.B88E3DB1-ON05256CDE.0072F2DC@us.ibm.com>

On Monday, 03/03/2003 at 03:31 EST, "Clemm, Geoff"
<nngclemm___at___Rational.Com@smallcue.com> wrote:
> OK, since the bind protocol only introduces one
> new method, with simple behavior in the presence of
> locks, I'm happy to add the appropriate precondition
> to the BIND definition.  In particular, I propose to
> add the following precondition:
> (DAV:locked-update-allowed): if the collection identified by the
> is write-locked, then the appropriate token MUST be specified in an If
> request header.
> Anyone object to this addition?

I don't object, but I feel if we do add this, we'll also have to list the
of the binding being protected by a lock in the subtree.   I think that
isn't covered
by the wording above.    I'm not sure if you want to reword this one or add

Received on Monday, 3 March 2003 16:06:21 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 20:01:28 UTC