Re: Operations not Atomic (was: bind draft issues)

On Monday, 03/03/2003 at 11:35 PST, Brian Korver
<nnbriank___at___xythos.com@smallcue.com> wrote:
> I disagree strongly.  Nothing should be stated to prohibit
> atomic operations, but the spec should leave this decision
> up to implementors.  There can be perfectly valid reasons
> why a server vendor might want to provide normal filesystem
> semantics to users.

What non-atomic file system semantics in particular are you
refering to here that you feel should be acceptable but are
prohibited.


------------------------------------------
Phone: 914-784-7569,   ccjason@us.ibm.com
I do not check nn621779@smallcue.com

Received on Monday, 3 March 2003 15:46:47 UTC