- From: Jim Whitehead <ejw@cse.ucsc.edu>
- Date: Wed, 19 Feb 2003 17:34:12 -0800
- To: <w3c-dist-auth@w3c.org>
Well, that pretty much settles the argument over the use of Translate. :-) - Jim > -----Original Message----- > From: w3c-dist-auth-request@w3.org > [mailto:w3c-dist-auth-request@w3.org]On Behalf Of Roy T. Fielding > Sent: Wednesday, February 19, 2003 2:52 PM > To: w3c-dist-auth@w3c.org > Subject: Microsoft patent on Translate header field > > > > US Patent 6,449,633. Whatever. > > http://patft.uspto.gov/netacgi/nph- > Parser?Sect1=PTO1&Sect2=HITOFF&d=PALL&p=1&u=/netahtml/ > srchnum.htm&r=1&f=G&l=50&s1=6,449,633.WKU.&OS=PN/6,449,633&RS=PN/ > 6,449,633 > > ....Roy
Received on Wednesday, 19 February 2003 20:46:02 UTC