- From: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@greenbytes.de>
- Date: Fri, 7 Feb 2003 14:58:46 +0100
- To: <w3c-dist-auth@w3.org>
Hi, back in October, Stefan Eissing wrote: > Maybe it would be more appropriate to reuse the response codes as > defined for MOVE in RFC 2518: > > 201: newly created > 204: replaced existing resource >etc. I agree. MOVE should be identical to BIND/DELETE, and therefore consistency with MOVE response codes seems to make sense. Proposal: Add the sentence: "In case of success, the server SHOULD return 201 (Created) when a new binding was created and 204 (No Content) when an existing binding was replaced". Julian -- <green/>bytes GmbH -- http://www.greenbytes.de -- tel:+492512807760
Received on Friday, 7 February 2003 08:59:12 UTC