- From: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
- Date: Mon, 3 Feb 2003 13:33:38 +0100
- To: "Webdav WG" <w3c-dist-auth@w3c.org>
> From: w3c-dist-auth-request@w3.org > [mailto:w3c-dist-auth-request@w3.org]On Behalf Of Lisa Dusseault > Sent: Monday, February 03, 2003 5:29 AM > To: Webdav WG > Subject: Normative reference updates > > > > > I just noticed that since RFC2518, a bunch of WebDAV's normative > references have themselves been updated, not just HTTP 1.1. > > ... > > Language identification: RFC1766 obsoleted by two documents > - RFC3066, "Best Current Practice" > - RFC3282, Draft Standard > - Which of these two -- or both -- does RFC2518bis need to make > normative reference to? Informational reference? Are there any changes > which would require changes in WebDAV? I think the best change would be just to remove the sentence with these references (it's part of XML's language handling, we don't need to repeat that information). > REC-XML > - http://www.w3.org/TR/1998/REC-xml-19980210 was updated to > http://www.w3.org/TR/2000/REC-xml-20001006 > - Any changes required to WebDAV? No. > ... > > ISO-* -- I don't know ISO-8601: we need that for the date format -- AFAIR, we had planned drop our own definition anyway, and to use a specific subset that happens to be the same (was that an IETF or a W3C spec?) ISO-639: see RFC1766 > .. -- <green/>bytes GmbH -- http://www.greenbytes.de -- tel:+492512807760
Received on Monday, 3 February 2003 07:34:10 UTC