- From: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
- Date: Fri, 27 Jun 2003 08:22:07 +0200
- To: "Chris Knight" <Christopher.D.Knight@nasa.gov>, <w3c-dist-auth@w3.org>
Chris, yes, both should appear. Can you explain why you think that it needs to be stated more explicitly? Julian -- <green/>bytes GmbH -- http://www.greenbytes.de -- tel:+492512807760 > -----Original Message----- > From: w3c-dist-auth-request@w3.org > [mailto:w3c-dist-auth-request@w3.org]On Behalf Of Chris Knight > Sent: Friday, June 27, 2003 1:39 AM > To: w3c-dist-auth@w3.org > Subject: BIND spec and PROPFIND Depth: infinity question(s) > > > > I would like some clarification (that should probably make it into the > BIND spec.) > > If I have a binding from /a/b to g and from /a/b/c to g and I do an > infinite PROPFIND, starting at /a/b, should I get results with both > "/a/b/g" and "/a/b/c/g" (two URIs for the same resource)? I'm assuming > so (and, hence, the resourceid property would enable me to determine > that these are the same resource.) > > If you haven't guessed, I'm actively trying to develop a server capable > of handling the BIND spec. (And, perhaps, the changes I make may end up > in Catacomb, as reality permits.) >
Received on Friday, 27 June 2003 02:22:11 UTC