W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-dist-auth@w3.org > April to June 2003

RE: BIND response code 200

From: Lisa Dusseault <lisa@xythos.com>
Date: Thu, 22 May 2003 07:48:05 -0700
To: "'Pill, Juergen'" <Juergen.Pill@softwareag.com>, <w3c-dist-auth@w3.org>
Message-ID: <049d01c32071$272befd0$fdcb90c6@lisalap>
Good catch.  I agree, 200 is best used when there's a body and 204 for
no-body successes.  Who knows, there may be minor glitches when a proxy sees
a 200 and no body (or Content-Length or Content-Type headers).

-----Original Message-----
From: w3c-dist-auth-request@w3.org [mailto:w3c-dist-auth-request@w3.org] On
Behalf Of Pill, Juergen
Sent: Thursday, May 22, 2003 3:43 AM
To: w3c-dist-auth@w3.org
Subject: BIND response code 200


The BIND method will return 201, if the bind was created and 200 is the
existing bind was overwritten.

In case of overwrite; wouldn't a response code of 204 better comply with
other commands in the WebDAV standard, e.g. PUT?

Best regards,

Received on Thursday, 22 May 2003 10:47:53 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 20:01:29 UTC