- From: Lisa Dusseault <lisa@xythos.com>
- Date: Thu, 22 May 2003 07:48:05 -0700
- To: "'Pill, Juergen'" <Juergen.Pill@softwareag.com>, <w3c-dist-auth@w3.org>
Received on Thursday, 22 May 2003 10:47:53 UTC
Good catch. I agree, 200 is best used when there's a body and 204 for no-body successes. Who knows, there may be minor glitches when a proxy sees a 200 and no body (or Content-Length or Content-Type headers). Lisa -----Original Message----- From: w3c-dist-auth-request@w3.org [mailto:w3c-dist-auth-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Pill, Juergen Sent: Thursday, May 22, 2003 3:43 AM To: w3c-dist-auth@w3.org Subject: BIND response code 200 Hello, The BIND method will return 201, if the bind was created and 200 is the existing bind was overwritten. In case of overwrite; wouldn't a response code of 204 better comply with other commands in the WebDAV standard, e.g. PUT? Best regards, Juergen
Received on Thursday, 22 May 2003 10:47:53 UTC