- From: B. Shadgar <shadgar@cs.bris.ac.uk>
- Date: Wed, 23 Apr 2003 18:02:12 +0100
- To: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
- CC: w3c-dist-auth <w3c-dist-auth@w3.org>
Julian Reschke wrote: > Hi, > > some more thoughts: > > Properties are attached to resources. Ordering is a property of the > collection that contains internal member names identifying resources. For > instance, you might have several collections containing bindings to the same > set of resources, but with different orderings. There's no way to simulate > this with DASL (which -- by the way -- is not nearly done...) and returning > ordered results. > > Julian > Ok, what if we define a live property called resource-name which is representing the name of a resource? Bita.
Received on Wednesday, 23 April 2003 13:02:38 UTC