- From: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
- Date: Wed, 23 Apr 2003 17:28:45 +0200
- To: "B. Shadgar" <shadgar@cs.bris.ac.uk>, "WebDAV" <w3c-dist-auth@w3.org>
> From: w3c-dist-auth-request@w3.org > [mailto:w3c-dist-auth-request@w3.org]On Behalf Of B. Shadgar > Sent: Wednesday, April 23, 2003 5:17 PM > To: Jim Whitehead > Cc: WebDAV > Subject: Re: Reminder: WG Last Call on Ordered Collections > > ... > > May I ask about practical example or cases about WebDAV Ordered > Collections > protocol. It is not clear to me why we define new protocol when > we have the > search protocol's ordering option. In other words, which aspects > of ordering > can not be covered by the search protocol's ordering option. See: <http://greenbytes.de/tech/webdav/draft-ietf-webdav-ordering-protocol-latest .html#rfc.section.2.p.2> -- <green/>bytes GmbH -- http://www.greenbytes.de -- tel:+492512807760
Received on Wednesday, 23 April 2003 11:28:53 UTC