- From: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
- Date: Thu, 7 Mar 2002 16:06:16 +0100
- To: "DAV" <w3c-dist-auth@w3.org>
Consider a PROPFIND request like:
<propfind xmlns='DAV:'><prop/></propfind>
I think this is clearly legal (by the DTD) and it can make sense if you're
for instance just getting a list of member URIs for a collection.
What format do we expect for the response body?
1)
<multistatus xmlns="DAV:">
<response>
<href>foobar</href>
</response>
</multistatus>
I think this makes a lot of sense, but it breaks the DTD for the response
element.
2)
<multistatus xmlns="DAV:">
<response>
<href>foobar</href>
<propstat>
<prop/>
<status>HTTP/1.1 200 OK</status>
</propstat>
</response>
</multistatus>
Conforms to the DTD, but isn't really logical (because in this case you may
expect a 200 propstat element in the case where all queried properties are
reported as 404 NOT FOUND as welll).
3)
<multistatus xmlns="DAV:">
<response>
<href>foobar</href>
<status>HTTP/1.1 200 OK</status>
</response>
</multistatus>
Conforms to the DTD as well, but isn't very logical. Why would the status
element on response be required, if it is not when properties *are*
reported.
Proposal:
allow format 1).
Julian
Received on Thursday, 7 March 2002 10:06:54 UTC