- From: Eric Sedlar <Eric.Sedlar@oracle.com>
- Date: Thu, 28 Feb 2002 11:44:10 -0800
- To: "Julian Reschke" <julian.reschke@gmx.de>, <w3c-dist-auth@w3c.org>
I thought the intent of dav:displayname was to be able to hold information like the <title> element that could be parsed out of an HTML file. I think that the collection member name is more of a default value for displayname than something that is required to correspond to the appropriate piece of the URL. I don't think we should make such a change. > -----Original Message----- > From: w3c-dist-auth-request@w3.org > [mailto:w3c-dist-auth-request@w3.org]On Behalf Of Julian Reschke > Sent: Thursday, February 28, 2002 11:03 AM > To: w3c-dist-auth@w3c.org > Subject: FW: href in where clause > > > (moving it to the right list) > > So maybe the RFC should say that "DAV:displayname" is a computed property > based on the name of the collection member? Does anybody have a > problem with > this? > > Julian > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Lisa Dusseault [mailto:lisa@xythos.com] > > Sent: Thursday, February 28, 2002 7:57 PM > > To: 'Julian Reschke'; 'dasl' > > Subject: RE: href in where clause > > > > > > In the server implementations I'm aware of: > > - displayname is not writable, because making it writable would be > > equivalent in these systems to a MOVE (rename) > > - displayname must be unique within a collection > > > > Lisa > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > From: www-webdav-dasl-request@w3.org > > > [mailto:www-webdav-dasl-request@w3.org]On Behalf Of Julian Reschke > > > Sent: Thursday, February 28, 2002 10:29 AM > > > To: 'dasl' > > > Subject: RE: href in where clause > > > > > > > > > Correct. > > > > > > Is it writable? Do all members of a collection have different > > > displaynames? > > > > > > Julian > > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > > From: www-webdav-dasl-request@w3.org > > > > [mailto:www-webdav-dasl-request@w3.org]On Behalf Of Lisa Dusseault > > > > Sent: Thursday, February 28, 2002 6:36 PM > > > > To: 'Julian Reschke'; 'dasl' > > > > Subject: RE: href in where clause > > > > > > > > > > > > A related problem, perhaps for RFC2518, is how displayname > > > should be used. > > > > If displayname is only the final path segment or filename of a > > > > href (as most > > > > products seem to be implemented), then displayname might be > > > sufficient for > > > > most of the kinds of searches you could do with href. > > > > > > > > Lisa > > > > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > > > From: www-webdav-dasl-request@w3.org > > > > > [mailto:www-webdav-dasl-request@w3.org]On Behalf Of Julian Reschke > > > > > Sent: Thursday, February 28, 2002 6:20 AM > > > > > To: dasl > > > > > Subject: DAV:href in where clause > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > DAV:href isn't a property, so it can't be used in queries. > > > > > > > > > > Is this a problem? Examples where DAV:displayname is queried > > > > > instead seem to > > > > > indicate that. A possible solution would be to allow DAV:href > > > > > whereever > > > > > DAV:prop is allowed in the where clause. > > > > > > > > > > For instance: > > > > > > > > > > <D:where> > > > > > <D:like> > > > > > <D:href/> > > > > > <D:literal>%.doc</D:literal> > > > > > </D:like> > > > > > </D:where> > > > > > > > > > > Of course it would be a problem that WebDAV is silent about > > > > > the allowed > > > > > formats that can appear in the href element (authority > > > > > mandatory? which > > > > > forms of relative URI references are allowed and interoperable?). > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
Received on Thursday, 28 February 2002 14:44:25 UTC