RE: RFC2518 ambiguity on creationdate/lastmodifieddate

• From: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
• Date: Thu, 7 Feb 2002 19:00:47 +0100
• To: "Clemm, Geoff" <gclemm@rational.com>, <w3c-dist-auth@w3.org>
• Message-ID: <JIEGINCHMLABHJBIGKBCGEMPDPAA.julian.reschke@gmx.de>

> From: w3c-dist-auth-request@w3.org
> [mailto:w3c-dist-auth-request@w3.org]On Behalf Of Clemm, Geoff
> Sent: Thursday, February 07, 2002 6:55 PM
> To: w3c-dist-auth@w3.org
> Subject: RE: RFC2518 ambiguity on creationdate/lastmodifieddate
> 
> 
> 2518 is at best ambiguous, and a worst, contradictory on this topic.
> 
> I would vote for (a) property not found.
> 
> (b) is a possible interpretation, but an empty value
> violates the DTD for this property.

Why would that be a violation?

Received on Thursday, 7 February 2002 13:01:23 UTC