Re: Interest in standardizing Batch methods?

Geoff Clemm <gclemm@rational.com> writes:

> I see no evidence of a BATCH method or a Request-Id header in my
> copy of 2616.  Could you indicate what sections of 2616 you are
> referring to?

Sorry I was unclear.  I only reused 2616's "application/http" media
type, rather than invent a new encoding for a sequence of HTTP
requests.  The BATCH method and Request-Id header I suggested are new
(Content-Id could also be used in a multipart with a "message/http"
body for each request).

Received on Friday, 11 January 2002 13:25:42 UTC