RE: Interest in standardizing Batch methods?

At 9:57 AM -0800 1/9/02, Jim Whitehead wrote:
>  > That said, it's still not clear batch methods are so necessary they'd
>>  preempt other work we've got to do.
>
>I agree that other work, especially the revision of RFC 2518, has higher
>priority than this.  But, since we'll be revising our charter soon, I was
>mostly interested to see if it should be added as a charter to-do item.
>
>- Jim

I would say "yes" if you phrase it in terms of general 
transactionality, not batch operations in particular.

     dan
-- 
Daniel Brotsky, Adobe Systems
tel 408-536-4150, pager 877-704-4062
2-way pager email: <mailto:page-dbrotsky@adobe.com>

Received on Wednesday, 9 January 2002 20:24:35 UTC