Friday, 29 March 2002
- RE: I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-webdav-ordering-protocol-02.txt
- I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-webdav-ordering-protocol-02.txt
- RE: Outlook Web Access
- FW: [Moderator Action] Webdav Search with IIS
Thursday, 28 March 2002
Wednesday, 27 March 2002
Tuesday, 26 March 2002
Monday, 25 March 2002
Friday, 22 March 2002
- Re: WebDAV and Open Pluggable Edge Services
- WebDAV properties vs. variants
- RE: WebDAV and Open Pluggable Edge Services
- RE: WebDAV and Open Pluggable Edge Services
- RE: WebDAV and Open Pluggable Edge Services
- Re: WebDAV and Open Pluggable Edge Services
- RE: WebDAV and Open Pluggable Edge Services
- Re: WebDAV and Open Pluggable Edge Services
- Re: Anyone have any MS web folder/Rosebud sample code?
- Anyone have any MS web folder/Rosebud sample code?
Thursday, 21 March 2002
- RE: WebDAV and Open Pluggable Edge Services
- RE: Unsubscribing...
- Unsubscribing...
- RFC2518bis, was: [Moderator Action] WebDAV WG minutes
- status of efforts, was: [Moderator Action] WebDAV WG minutes
- Re: WebDAV and Open Pluggable Edge Services
- Re: WebDAV and Open Pluggable Edge Services
- RE: WebDAV and Open Pluggable Edge Services
- RE: WebDAV and Open Pluggable Edge Services
Wednesday, 20 March 2002
- Re: WebDAV and Open Pluggable Edge Services
- Re: WebDAV and Service Location Protocol
- RE: how to specify extension features in response to OPTIONS request
- WebDAV and Service Location Protocol
- FW: [Moderator Action] WebDAV WG minutes
- WebDAV and Open Pluggable Edge Services
- RE: how to specify extension features in response to OPTIONS request
Tuesday, 19 March 2002
Monday, 18 March 2002
- Re: Help me please with idisk
- RE: Help me please with idisk
- FW: Help me please with idisk
- Re: WebDAV Matrix
- RE: WebDAV Matrix
Friday, 15 March 2002
- Microsoft webfolders WebDAV incompatibility issues
- Mac OS X WebDAV file system
- RE: WebDAV Matrix
- FW: WebDAV Help!!!
- FW: WebDAV Matrix
Tuesday, 12 March 2002
Monday, 11 March 2002
Friday, 8 March 2002
- Re: RFC 3253 - Versioning Extensions to WebDAV
- RFC 3253 - Versioning Extensions to WebDAV
- RE: RFC2518 issue: format for multistatus when no property report ed at all
- Re: Translate (was RE: DAV-Enabled field (was RE: A case for GETSRC))
Thursday, 7 March 2002
- RE: RFC2518 issue: format for multistatus when no property report ed at all
- RFC2518 issue: format for multistatus when no property reported at all
Wednesday, 6 March 2002
- RE: Translate (was RE: DAV-Enabled field (was RE: A case for GETSRC))
- RE: RFC2518bis: xml:lang (2.6)
- RE: DAV-Enabled field (was RE: A case for GETSRC)
- RE: DAV-Enabled field (was RE: A case for GETSRC)
- RE: Translate (was RE: DAV-Enabled field (was RE: A case for GETSRC))
- RE: DAV-Enabled field (was RE: A case for GETSRC)
- RE: DAV-Enabled field (was RE: A case for GETSRC)
- RE: DAV-Enabled field (was RE: A case for GETSRC)
- RE: Translate (was RE: DAV-Enabled field (was RE: A case for GETSRC))
- RE: DAV-Enabled field (was RE: A case for GETSRC)
- RE: Translate (was RE: DAV-Enabled field (was RE: A case for GETSRC))
- RE: Translate (was RE: DAV-Enabled field (was RE: A case for GETSRC))
- Re: DAV-Enabled field (was RE: A case for GETSRC)
- RE: DAV-Enabled field (was RE: A case for GETSRC)
- RE: DAV-Enabled field (was RE: A case for GETSRC)
- RE: Translate (was RE: DAV-Enabled field (was RE: A case for GETSRC))
Tuesday, 5 March 2002
- RE: [w3c-dist-auth] <none>
- Using DAV to save files
- FW: Newbie Question on WebDAV/Tomcat
- RE: DAV-Enabled field (was RE: A case for GETSRC)
- [w3c-dist-auth] <none>
- RE: DAV-Enabled field (was RE: A case for GETSRC)
- Re: DAV-Enabled field (was RE: A case for GETSRC)
Monday, 4 March 2002
- Translate (was RE: DAV-Enabled field (was RE: A case for GETSRC))
- RE: DAV-Enabled field (was RE: A case for GETSRC)
- RE: DAV-Enabled field (was RE: A case for GETSRC)
- Re: A case for GETSRC (or other mechanism to that effect)
- RE: DAV-Enabled field (was RE: A case for GETSRC)
- RE: DAV-Enabled field (was RE: A case for GETSRC)
- RE: DAV-Enabled field (was RE: A case for GETSRC)
- RE: A case for GETSRC (or other mechanism to that effect)
- RE: DAV-Enabled field (was RE: A case for GETSRC)
- RE: DAV-Enabled field (was RE: A case for GETSRC)
- Re: A case for GETSRC (or other mechanism to that effect)
- RE: DAV-Enabled field (was RE: A case for GETSRC)
- RE: A case for GETSRC (or other mechanism to that effect)
- Re: A case for GETSRC (or other mechanism to that effect)
- FW: COPY-Method over the Web
- RE: Shared locks
Sunday, 3 March 2002
Saturday, 2 March 2002
- RE: DAV-Enabled field (was RE: A case for GETSRC)
- RE: DAV-Enabled field (was RE: A case for GETSRC)
- RE: DAV-Enabled field (was RE: A case for GETSRC)
- Re: DAV-Enabled field (was RE: A case for GETSRC)
- Re: DAV-Enabled field (was RE: A case for GETSRC)
- Re: DAV-Enabled field (was RE: A case for GETSRC)
- RE: DAV-Enabled field (was RE: A case for GETSRC)
- RE: DAV-Enabled field (was RE: A case for GETSRC)
- RE: DAV-Enabled field (was RE: A case for GETSRC)
- RE: A case for GETSRC (or other mechanism to that effect)
Friday, 1 March 2002
- RE: Source header instead of property?
- DAV-Enabled field (was RE: A case for GETSRC)
- RE: Source header instead of property? (was Re: A case for GETSR C (or other mechanism to that effect))
- RE: space
- Re: Source header instead of property?
- RE: A case for GETSRC (or other mechanism to that effect)
- RE: A case for GETSRC (or other mechanism to that effect)
- RE: A case for GETSRC (or other mechanism to that effect)
- RE: Source header instead of property? (was Re: A case for GETSR C (or other mechanism to that effect))
- RE: A case for GETSRC (or other mechanism to that effect)
- Re: Source header instead of property? (was Re: A case for GETSR C (or other mechanism to that effect))
- RE: Source header instead of property? (was Re: A case for GETSR C (or other mechanism to that effect))
- RE: Source header instead of property? (was Re: A case for GETSR C (or other mechanism to that effect))
- xml:space
- RE: A case for GETSRC (or other mechanism to that effect)
- Source header instead of property? (was Re: A case for GETSRC (or other mechanism to that effect))
- RE: A case for GETSRC (or other mechanism to that effect)
- RE: Shared locks
- RE: A case for GETSRC (or other mechanism to that effect)
Thursday, 28 February 2002
- RE: A case for GETSRC (or other mechanism to that effect)
- RE: A case for GETSRC (or other mechanism to that effect)
- RE: href in where clause
- RE: A case for GETSRC (or other mechanism to that effect)
- RE: href in where clause
- FW: href in where clause
- RE: A case for GETSRC (or other mechanism to that effect)
- RE: RFC2518 issue: DAV:href format
- RE: RFC2518 issue: DAV:href format
- RE: A case for GETSRC (or other mechanism to that effect)
- RE: A case for GETSRC (or other mechanism to that effect)
- RE: A case for GETSRC (or other mechanism to that effect)
- RE: Features of WEBDAV
- RE: A case for GETSRC (or other mechanism to that effect)
- RFC2518 issue: DAV:href format
- RE: A case for GETSRC (or other mechanism to that effect)
- RE: RFC2518bis: allprop deprecated (4.1)
- RE: A case for GETSRC (or other mechanism to that effect)
- RE: A case for GETSRC (or other mechanism to that effect)
- RE: A case for GETSRC (or other mechanism to that effect)
- RE: A case for GETSRC (or other mechanism to that effect)
- RE: A case for GETSRC (or other mechanism to that effect)
- RE: A case for GETSRC (or other mechanism to that effect)
- RE: A case for GETSRC (or other mechanism to that effect)
- RE: A case for GETSRC (or other mechanism to that effect)
- RE: A case for GETSRC (or other mechanism to that effect)
- A case for GETSRC (or other mechanism to that effect)
Wednesday, 27 February 2002
- Re: Using DAV namespace for proprietary properties
- Issue: DUPLICATE_PROPERTIES
- RE: Features of WEBDAV
- RE: Windows XP Webdav redirector
- WG Meeting at Minneapolis IETF 53
- WG: Features of WEBDAV
Tuesday, 26 February 2002
- shared locks and IIS, was: Shared locks
- Re: Using DAV namespace for proprietary properties
- Newbie question about LOCK
Monday, 25 February 2002
- Re: Using DAV namespace for proprietary properties
- Re: rfc2518 issue: DEFER_LOCK_NULL_RESOURCES_IN_SPEC
- Re: rfc2518 issue: DEFER_LOCK_NULL_RESOURCES_IN_SPEC
- Re: rfc2518 issue: DEFER_LOCK_NULL_RESOURCES_IN_SPEC
- Re: [dav-dev] Re: Problem with OfficeXP and Accented characters
- Re: IETF meeting: Refreshing locks
Sunday, 24 February 2002
- RE: Using DAV namespace for proprietary properties
- RE: [dav-dev] Re: Problem with OfficeXP and Accented characters
- RE: [dav-dev] Re: Problem with OfficeXP and Accented characters
- RE: Using DAV namespace for proprietary properties
- RE: Using DAV namespace for proprietary properties
Saturday, 23 February 2002
- RE: IETF meeting: Refreshing locks
- RE: read/write privileges
- RE: Using DAV namespace for proprietary properties
- RE: Using DAV namespace for proprietary properties
- RE: Using DAV namespace for proprietary properties
Friday, 22 February 2002
- Re: Using DAV namespace for proprietary properties
- Re: [dav-dev] Re: Problem with OfficeXP and Accented characters
- Re: Problem with OfficeXP and Accented characters
- Re: [dav-dev] Problem with OfficeXP and Accented characters
- RE: Using DAV namespace for proprietary properties
Thursday, 21 February 2002
- RE: Shared locks
- Re: [dav-dev] Problem with OfficeXP and Accented characters
- RE: Shared locks
- read/write privileges
- I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-webdav-rfc2518bis-00.txt
- RFC2518bis: allprop deprecated (4.1)
- RFC2518bis: xml:lang (2.6)
Wednesday, 20 February 2002
- MOVE command fails with 502 bad gateway on apache server
- New draft: RFC2518bis
- Re: Using DAV namespace for proprietary properties
- Re: MOVE command fails with 502 bad gateway on apache server
- RE: [dav-dev] Problem with OfficeXP and Accented characters
- Re: [dav-dev] Problem with OfficeXP and Accented characters
- Re: [dav-dev] Problem with OfficeXP and Accented characters
Tuesday, 19 February 2002
- RE: Using DAV namespace for proprietary properties
- WebDAV book authors
- RE: Using DAV namespace for proprietary properties
- RE: rfc2518 issue: DEFER_LOCK_NULL_RESOURCES_IN_SPEC
- RE: rfc2518 issue: DEFER_LOCK_NULL_RESOURCES_IN_SPEC
- IETF meeting: Refreshing locks
Monday, 18 February 2002
- RE: Using DAV namespace for proprietary properties
- RE: rfc2518 issue: DEFER_LOCK_NULL_RESOURCES_IN_SPEC
- Using DAV namespace for proprietary properties
- RE: rfc2518 issue: DEFER_LOCK_NULL_RESOURCES_IN_SPEC
- Re: rfc2518 issue: DEFER_LOCK_NULL_RESOURCES_IN_SPEC
Sunday, 17 February 2002
Saturday, 16 February 2002
Friday, 15 February 2002
- Re: LOCK_URL_WITH_NO_PARENT_COLLECTION
- Re: LOCK_URL_WITH_NO_PARENT_COLLECTION
- Re: rfc2518 issue: DEFER_LOCK_NULL_RESOURCES_IN_SPEC
- re: rfc2518 issue: DEFER_LOCK_NULL_RESOURCES_IN_SPEC
Wednesday, 13 February 2002
- Re: root of a lock, was HOW_TO_IDENTIFY_LOCK_OWNER
- Re: RFC2518 ambiguity on creationdate/lastmodifieddate
Monday, 11 February 2002
Saturday, 9 February 2002
Friday, 8 February 2002
- RE: RFC2518 ambiguity on creationdate/lastmodifieddate
- RE: RFC2518 ambiguity on creationdate/lastmodifieddate
- RE: RFC2518 ambiguity on creationdate/lastmodifieddate
- RE: RFC2518 ambiguity on creationdate/lastmodifieddate
Thursday, 7 February 2002
- RE: RFC2518 ambiguity on creationdate/lastmodifieddate
- RE: RFC2518 ambiguity on creationdate/lastmodifieddate
- RE: RFC2518 ambiguity on creationdate/lastmodifieddate
- RE: RFC2518 ambiguity on creationdate/lastmodifieddate
- RE: Issue: DAV_WITH_COLON_IS_NOT_A_URI
- RE: Issue: DAV_WITH_COLON_IS_NOT_A_URI
- Re: Issue: DAV_WITH_COLON_IS_NOT_A_URI
Wednesday, 6 February 2002
Monday, 4 February 2002
- RE: Is KEEPALIVE worth keeping?
- RE: Whatever happened with Partial PUTs
- Is KEEPALIVE worth keeping?
- Whatever happened with Partial PUTs
Friday, 1 February 2002
Thursday, 31 January 2002
- RE: Issue: IS_HREF_A_CHILD_OF_KEEPALIVE
- RE: Issue: IS_HREF_A_CHILD_OF_KEEPALIVE
- RE: Issue: IS_HREF_A_CHILD_OF_KEEPALIVE
- RE: Issue: IS_HREF_A_CHILD_OF_KEEPALIVE
- RE: HOW_TO_IDENTIFY_LOCK_OWNER
- RE: HOW_TO_IDENTIFY_LOCK_OWNER
- Issue: IS_HREF_A_CHILD_OF_KEEPALIVE
Tuesday, 29 January 2002
- RE: HOW_TO_IDENTIFY_LOCK_OWNER
- RE: HOW_TO_IDENTIFY_LOCK_OWNER
- RE: HOW_TO_IDENTIFY_LOCK_OWNER
- RE: HOW_TO_IDENTIFY_LOCK_OWNER
- RE: HOW_TO_IDENTIFY_LOCK_OWNER
- RE: HOW_TO_IDENTIFY_LOCK_OWNER
- RE: HOW_TO_IDENTIFY_LOCK_OWNER
- RE: HOW_TO_IDENTIFY_LOCK_OWNER
- RE: HOW_TO_IDENTIFY_LOCK_OWNER
- RE: HOW_TO_IDENTIFY_LOCK_OWNER
Monday, 28 January 2002
- RE: HOW_TO_IDENTIFY_LOCK_OWNER
- RE: HOW_TO_IDENTIFY_LOCK_OWNER
- RE: HOW_TO_IDENTIFY_LOCK_OWNER
- RE: HOW_TO_IDENTIFY_LOCK_OWNER
- RE: HOW_TO_IDENTIFY_LOCK_OWNER
- RE: HOW_TO_IDENTIFY_LOCK_OWNER
- new (well, old) issue to be added to issues list: keepalive
- RE: HOW_TO_IDENTIFY_LOCK_OWNER
- RE: RFC2518: depth XML element: Infinite
- RE: HOW_TO_IDENTIFY_LOCK_OWNER
- RE: HOW_TO_IDENTIFY_LOCK_OWNER
- RE: RFC2518: depth XML element: Infinite
- RFC2518: depth XML element: Infinite
Sunday, 27 January 2002
Saturday, 26 January 2002
Friday, 25 January 2002
- RE: HOW_TO_IDENTIFY_LOCK_OWNER
- RE: Multiple resourcetypes?
- RE: Multiple resourcetypes?
- FW: Multiple resourcetypes?
- WebDAV DB question
- RE: need clarification about COPY to locked resource response cod e
- RE: need clarification about COPY to locked resource response cod e
- need clarification about COPY to locked resource response code
Thursday, 24 January 2002
- Re: Missing <status> elements from examples in the DeltaV specificati on
- Missing <status> elements from examples in the DeltaV specificati on
- Re: WebDav question
- FW: WebDav question
Tuesday, 22 January 2002
- RE: HOW_TO_IDENTIFY_LOCK_OWNER
- RE: HOW_TO_IDENTIFY_LOCK_OWNER
- RE: HOW_TO_IDENTIFY_LOCK_OWNER
- RE: Searching folders with WebDAV
- RE: Searching folders with WebDAV
Monday, 21 January 2002
- RE: Searching folders with WebDAV
- re: [dav-dev] re: ms ie/office/web folder behaviors with webdav
- FW: Searching folders with WebDAV
Saturday, 19 January 2002
- RE: HOW_TO_IDENTIFY_LOCK_OWNER
- RE: HOW_TO_IDENTIFY_LOCK_OWNER
- FW: Wikified WebDAV documentation site
Friday, 18 January 2002
- RE: HOW_TO_IDENTIFY_LOCK_OWNER
- RE: HOW_TO_IDENTIFY_LOCK_OWNER
- RE: HOW_TO_IDENTIFY_LOCK_OWNER
- Slide Project
- RE:DASL client
Thursday, 17 January 2002
Wednesday, 16 January 2002
Tuesday, 15 January 2002
- RE: HOW_TO_IDENTIFY_LOCK_OWNER
- RE: [Q] - making a Win32 app DAV-aware...
- [Q] - making a Win32 app DAV-aware...(continued)...
- [Q] - making a Win32 app DAV-aware...
- DANGER!!
- RE: Interest in standardizing Batch methods?
- RE: Interest in standardizing Batch methods?
- RE: HOW_TO_IDENTIFY_LOCK_OWNER
- RE: Windows XP Webdav redirector
- RE: HOW_TO_IDENTIFY_LOCK_OWNER
- RE: HOW_TO_IDENTIFY_LOCK_OWNER
- RE: HOW_TO_IDENTIFY_LOCK_OWNER
- RE: HOW_TO_IDENTIFY_LOCK_OWNER
- RE: HOW_TO_IDENTIFY_LOCK_OWNER
Monday, 14 January 2002
- RE: root of a lock, was HOW_TO_IDENTIFY_LOCK_OWNER
- RE: Windows XP Webdav redirector
- Re: Windows XP Webdav redirector
- RE: root of a lock, was HOW_TO_IDENTIFY_LOCK_OWNER
- RE: HOW_TO_IDENTIFY_LOCK_OWNER
- RE: HOW_TO_IDENTIFY_LOCK_OWNER
- RE: HOW_TO_IDENTIFY_LOCK_OWNER
- RE: HOW_TO_IDENTIFY_LOCK_OWNER
- Windows XP Webdav redirector
- RE: HOW_TO_IDENTIFY_LOCK_OWNER
- RE: root of a lock, was HOW_TO_IDENTIFY_LOCK_OWNER
- RE: root of a lock, was HOW_TO_IDENTIFY_LOCK_OWNER
- RE: HOW_TO_IDENTIFY_LOCK_OWNER
Sunday, 13 January 2002
Friday, 11 January 2002
- Re: Interest in standardizing Batch methods?
- RE: Database-based webDAV server
- RE: HOW_TO_IDENTIFY_LOCK_OWNER
- RE: Interest in standardizing Batch methods?
- RE: HOW_TO_IDENTIFY_LOCK_OWNER
- RE: HOW_TO_IDENTIFY_LOCK_OWNER
- RE: HOW_TO_IDENTIFY_LOCK_OWNER
- RE: I-D ACTION:draft-dusseault-dav-quota-01.txt
- Re: Database-based webDAV server
- RE: HOW_TO_IDENTIFY_LOCK_OWNER
- RE: HOW_TO_IDENTIFY_LOCK_OWNER
- RE: HOW_TO_IDENTIFY_LOCK_OWNER
- RE: HOW_TO_IDENTIFY_LOCK_OWNER
- Re: FW: I-D ACTION:draft-dusseault-dav-quota-01.txt
Thursday, 10 January 2002
- Database-based webDAV server
- RE: How do I make my app DAV-aware?
- RE: How do I make my app DAV-aware?
- FW: How do I make my app DAV-aware?
- FW: I-D ACTION:draft-dusseault-dav-quota-01.txt
- RE: Interest in standardizing Batch methods?
Wednesday, 9 January 2002
- RE: Interest in standardizing Batch methods?
- Re: Interest in standardizing Batch methods?
- RE: Interest in standardizing Batch methods?
- RE: Interest in standardizing Batch methods?
- RE: Interest in standardizing Batch methods?
- RE: Interest in standardizing Batch methods?
- RE: Interest in standardizing Batch methods?
- RE: Interest in standardizing Batch methods?
- RE: Interest in standardizing Batch methods?
- RE: Interest in standardizing Batch methods?
- RE: Interest in standardizing Batch methods?
- RE: Interest in standardizing Batch methods?
- RE: HOW_TO_IDENTIFY_LOCK_OWNER
- RE: Interest in standardizing Batch methods?
- RE: Interest in standardizing Batch methods?
Tuesday, 8 January 2002
- RE: HOW_TO_IDENTIFY_LOCK_OWNER
- Re: Problems with Intercepting WebDAV with IIS to simulate filesystem with a DB
- RE: Interest in standardizing Batch methods?
- RE: Interest in standardizing Batch methods?
- Re: Interest in standardizing Batch methods?
Monday, 7 January 2002
- Problems with Intercepting WebDAV with IIS to simulate filesystem with a DB
- RE: Webdav issue: UNLOCK_BY_NON_LOCK_OWNERS