- From: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
- Date: Tue, 28 May 2002 09:03:17 +0200
- To: "Jason Crawford" <ccjason@us.ibm.com>, "Julian Reschke" <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
- Cc: "Jim Whitehead" <ejw@cse.ucsc.edu>, "Roy T. Fielding" <fielding@apache.org>, "Webdav WG \(E-mail\)" <w3c-dist-auth@w3c.org>, <w3c-dist-auth-request@w3.org>
> From: w3c-dist-auth-request@w3.org > [mailto:w3c-dist-auth-request@w3.org]On Behalf Of Jason Crawford > Sent: Monday, May 27, 2002 5:32 PM > To: Julian Reschke > Cc: Jim Whitehead; Roy T. Fielding; Webdav WG (E-mail); > w3c-dist-auth-request@w3.org > Subject: RE: Issue: SOURCE_PROPERTY_UNDERSPECIFIED > > > > It sounds like we're converging on a proposal that looks much > like Julian's > at the bottom of the following posting... > > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-dist-auth/2001OctDec/0119.html > > > I have one other proposal to make. It's based on the above proposal, but > adjusts it a bit so that we have room to > add other structured data to the source tag later if we want. It just > creates a tag (sourcelabel) to envelop the optional? natural > language description of the source. > > > <D:prop xmlns:D="DAV:" xmlns:F="http://www.foocorp.com/Project/"> > <D:source-set> > <D:source xlink:href="http://foo.bar/src/main.c" > xlink:role="UriDescribingTheRole"> > <D:sourcelabel xml:lang="en">source file</D:sourcelabel> > </D:source> > <D:source xlink:href="http://foo.bar/src/main.lib" > xlink:role="UriDescribingTheRole"> > <D:sourcelabel xml:lang="en">library file</D:sourcelabel> > </D:source> > <D:source xlink:href="http://foo.bar/src/makefile" > xlink:role="UriDescribingTheRole"> > <D:sourcelabel xml:lang="en">makefile</D:sourcelabel> > </D:source> > </D:source-set> > </D:prop> Fine with me. 1) Idea: maybe D:sourcelabel could be named more generically, such as: D:displayname. > Also please comment on how you'd express the situation where a single > source URL has multiple roles. 2) That's something XLink (at least simple XLinks) do not handle. Do you have a specific use case where it wouldn't be appropiate to simply repeat the D:source element? Julian
Received on Tuesday, 28 May 2002 03:03:53 UTC