- From: Hiren Shah-SSI <hshah@ssi.samsung.com>
- Date: Thu, 9 May 2002 09:45:07 -0700
- To: "'Clemm, Geoff'" <gclemm@Rational.Com>, WebDAV <w3c-dist-auth@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <F9ADB2980C46D31182A5006097CB6A81022BE44C@HERMES>
Hi, I am totally new to DAV. I am just trying to find my way out. We have to use DAV in our application so I am searching abt it on google and got few links but can anyone let me know more abt it or can you send me any other links which are good . Thanks alot, Aarti -----Original Message----- From: Clemm, Geoff [mailto:gclemm@Rational.Com] Sent: Thursday, May 09, 2002 5:28 AM To: WebDAV Subject: RE: Microsoft WebFolders and resource type Not only is DAV:version as a resourcetype not in RFC-3253, it is explicitly forbidden in RFC-3253 (the DAV:resourcetype of a version must be the same as the DAV:resourcetype of the version-controlled resource that was checked in to create it). And also note that this one done to some extent with the WebFolders problem in mind ... In particular RFC-3253 only gives non-null DAV:resourcetype values to resources that have no content (which means that it should cause no problem to have them be treated as "folders" by WebFolders). Cheers, Geoff -----Original Message----- From: Julian Reschke [mailto:julian.reschke@gmx.de] Sent: Thursday, May 09, 2002 6:19 AM To: WebDAV Subject: RE: Microsoft WebFolders and resource type > From: Konstantin Knizhnik [mailto:KKnizhnik@togetherlab.com] > Sent: Wednesday, May 08, 2002 3:34 AM > To: w3c-dist-auth@w3.org > Subject: [Moderator Action] Microsoft WebFolders and resource type > > > Looks like, MS-Explorer treat each resource with not empty > <DAV:resourcetype> as collection. For example, if resource type is > > <DAV:resourcetype> > <DAV:version/> > </DAV:resourcetype> > > this version is displayed as folder. > Does anybody knows how to solve the problem and make > this version visible as normal file (not folder) in MS-Explorer? a) AFAIK, there's no workaround for this particular problem in Microsoft's compliant. Keep complaing to them. b) But: why are you trying to specify a resourcetype of DAV:version at the first place? That's not in RFC3253...
Received on Thursday, 9 May 2002 12:48:29 UTC