- From: Hall, Shaun <Shaun.Hall@gbr.xerox.com>
- Date: Mon, 20 Aug 2001 09:40:22 +0100
- To: "'W3C WebDAV Mailing List'" <w3c-dist-auth@w3.org>
Agreed with Geoff. We never liked the statement anyway :-) (could be abused too easily for a start). Shaun Hall Xerox Europe > -----Original Message----- > From: Jason Crawford [mailto:ccjason@us.ibm.com] > Sent: 18 August 2001 20:05 > To: WebDAV (E-mail) > Subject: RE: rfc2518 issue: LOCK_REFRESH_BY_METHODS > > > > > > Again. I'd like at least one more supportive comment before > I file this > one as resolved. Please pipe up. :-) > > > -------------------------------------------------------------- > --------------------------------------------- > > > > I'd just delete the paragraph in 9.8 that states: > > The timeout counter SHOULD be restarted any time an owner > of the lock > sends a method to any member of the lock, including unsupported > methods, or methods which are unsuccessful. However the > lock MUST be > refreshed if a refresh LOCK method is successfully received. > > The last sentence is redundant, since it is already specified in the > LOCK semantics. > > Cheers, > Geoff >
Received on Monday, 20 August 2001 04:40:43 UTC