- From: Tim Ellison <Tim_Ellison@uk.ibm.com>
- Date: Thu, 16 Aug 2001 09:55:36 +0100
- To: "Jason Crawford" <ccjason@us.ibm.com>
- Cc: w3c-dist-auth@w3.org
> Actually Jim wasn't disagree'ing with you on what we propose here. He was > additionally proposing that the first PUT after the resource is created *also* > return 201. I don't think that issue is on the issues list. If Jim advocates it again, > we can put it on the list. I'd object to such a proposition since it contradicts a RFC2616 SHOULD requirement for modifying an exiting resource with PUT. Regards, Tim
Received on Thursday, 16 August 2001 05:05:49 UTC