- From: Tim Ellison <Tim_Ellison@uk.ibm.com>
- Date: Wed, 15 Aug 2001 09:21:40 +0100
- To: w3c-dist-auth@w3.org
BTW: Jim W. objected when I made this suggestion a couple of months ago. (http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-dist-auth/2001AprJun/0302.html) He is, of course, free to change his mind<g> Regards, Tim Jason wrote: > I'm marking the following issue: > > What status code should be returned when a lock null > resource is created ? 200 OK or 201 Created? A related > issue is what status code should be returned by a PUT > or MKCOL on a lock-null resource? MKCOL is defined to > be 201, PUT could be 200 or 201 (201 seems like a > slightly better choice). > > ...as resolved by our apparent consensus on the addition > of the following wording for a status code for LOCK requests... > > 201 (Created) - The lock request succeeded by creating a > new resource and the value of the lockdiscovery property > is included in the body. > > > Discussion in the thread that includes the following > posting by Stefan... > > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-dist-auth/2001JulSep/0129.html >
Received on Wednesday, 15 August 2001 04:45:49 UTC