- From: Clemm, Geoff <gclemm@rational.com>
- Date: Thu, 5 Jul 2001 09:30:52 -0400
- To: w3c-dist-auth@w3.org
From: Steinar Bang [mailto:sb@metis.no] > but I don't know whether or not servers tend to fail requests to get > write-locks on read-only resources. I thought 8.10.7 of RFC 2518 would require them to return a 412 in this case (ie. "lock token not enforcable on this resource")...? A write lock does not guarantee the lock-token-holder the ability to write to a resource ... it just denies non-lock-token-holders that ability. So a server would be enforcing the lock, even if there are reasons (such as ACLs) that prevent the lock-holder from writing to the resource. Cheers, Geoff
Received on Thursday, 5 July 2001 09:24:16 UTC