- From: John Stracke <francis@ecal.com>
- Date: Wed, 20 Dec 2000 08:58:52 -0500
- To: w3c-dist-auth@w3.org
"Roy T. Fielding" wrote: > Accept headers are a bad idea. They have always been a bad idea. > A better solution is to provide the client with the primary content > choice and a means of obtaining the new content. But, in this case, the content is an error message; this approach would require that the error message be stored on the server for a time, available at (say) some other URL. That's kind of an unpleasant requirement--especially if the error that's being reported is "disk full". -- /===============================================================\ |John Stracke | http://www.ecal.com |My opinions are my own. | |Chief Scientist |==============================================| |eCal Corp. |Some days, it just doesn't pay to gnaw through| |francis@ecal.com|the straps. | \===============================================================/
Received on Wednesday, 20 December 2000 12:53:18 UTC