- From: Slein, Judith A <JSlein@crt.xerox.com>
- Date: Fri, 3 Mar 2000 09:51:03 -0500
- To: "'Joe Orton'" <joe@orton.demon.co.uk>, WebDAV WG <w3c-dist-auth@w3.org>
It's certainly a possibility. The only problem I can see with relying on MKREF is that it would not just update the target, but would replace the resource with a new resource. That's probably harmless if it's an HTTP resource with no properties, but if it is a WebDAV resource it might have properties that you would like to preserve while updating its target. --Judy -----Original Message----- From: Joe Orton [mailto:joe@orton.demon.co.uk] Sent: Wednesday, March 01, 2000 7:05 PM To: WebDAV WG Subject: Re: Bindings and Redirect Ref. teleconf. Mar. 1, 2000 > Issue #6: Need to add rationale for why we use relative URLs. Server is > required to store it as a relative URL. Server MUST NOT change the relative > URL during a MOVE. > > Raises the issue of needing separate methods for getting the value of a > reference, and modifying the value of a reference. Tentatively agreed on > REFGET, REFSET (but noone likes these too much). The original -00 spec allowed MKREF with Overwrite, could this be used instead of REFSET? joe
Received on Friday, 3 March 2000 09:51:49 UTC