- From: Clemm, Geoff <gclemm@Rational.Com>
- Date: Fri, 25 Feb 2000 17:56:16 -0500
- To: "'w3c-dist-auth@w3.org'" <w3c-dist-auth@w3.org>
Oops! Chuck is of course correct. Sorry about that! Cheers, Geoff -----Original Message----- From: Fay, Chuck [mailto:CFay@filenet.com] Sent: Friday, February 25, 2000 6:04 PM To: Clemm, Geoff; 'w3c-dist-auth@w3.org' Subject: RE: WebDAV Bindings - Issue Yaron.5.3Huh? Geoff, Shouldn't that be <http://zizbang/rocky/blah> in the last sentence? --Chuck Fay FileNET Corporation, 3565 Harbor Blvd., Costa Mesa, CA 92626 phone: (714) 327-3513, fax: (714) 327-5076, email: cfay@filenet.com > -----Original Message----- > From: Clemm, Geoff [mailto:gclemm@Rational.Com] > Sent: Friday, February 25, 2000 2:15 PM > To: 'w3c-dist-auth@w3.org' > Subject: RE: WebDAV Bindings - Issue Yaron.5.3Huh? > > > How about the following: > > Suppose: > - C is a collection > - R is a resource > - C-MAP is the set of URI's mapped to C > - a BIND request causes a binding from "Binding-Name" to > resource R to be > added to collection C > Then immediately following the BIND request, for each "C-URI" > in C-MAP, > the URI "C-URI/Binding-Name" is mapped to resource R. > > Then using a facsimile of Yaron's example, if I have a > collection whose > C-Map is the set {<http://icky/bop>, <http://zizbang/rocky>} > (i.e. those > two URL's map to this collection), and I perform a BIND that > successfully > adds to this collection a binding from "blah" to resource R, then > following this BIND, the URL <http://icky/bop/blah> maps to R and > the URL <http://zizbang/rocky> also maps to R. > > Cheers, > Geoff > > > -----Original Message----- > From: w3c-dist-auth-request@w3.org > [mailto:w3c-dist-auth-request@w3.org]On > Behalf Of Yaron Goland > Sent: Sunday, January 16, 2000 8:52 PM > To: w3c-dist-auth@w3.org > Subject: WebDAV Bindings - Issue Yaron.5.3Huh? > > > The first paragraph of section 5.3 reads "Suppose a BIND > request causes a > binding from "Binding-Name" to resource R to be added to a > collection, C. > Then if C-MAP is the set of URI's that were mapped to C > before the BIND > request, then for each URI "C-URI" in C-MAP, the URI > "C-URI/Binding-Name" is > mapped to resource R following the BIND request." > I have a B.S. in CS & EE and got A's in my classes on > set theory and > I still can't read this paragraph. I tried over and over > again and I just > couldn't figure it out. If you are going to try to write set theory in > English you should at least translate it faithfully using the > appropriate > terms such as "for all" and "there is an instance of". > Personally I would > recommend just using an ASCII version of set code notation. > Whatever you do, > the current paragraph MUST go. It is unfathomable. In fact > here is the best > translation I have been able to come up with: Imagine I have > a collection > http://icky/bop which contains http://icky/bop/blah. Imagine > I now want to > map http://zizbang/rocky to http://icky/bop/rack. According > to this language > it would seem I would have to create a bind to http://icky/bop/blah/rack. I know this makes no sense but I swear that is what the sentence seemed to mean when I tried to read it four or five times. As such I move that the paragraph be rewritten.
Received on Friday, 25 February 2000 18:08:34 UTC