- From: <ccjason@us.ibm.com>
- Date: Fri, 11 Feb 2000 17:55:24 -0500
- To: "Roy T. Fielding" <fielding@kiwi.ICS.UCI.EDU>
- cc: Jim Whitehead <ejw@ics.uci.edu>, fielding@ebuilt.com, w3c-dist-auth@w3.org
In other words, if you just remove *everything* in the bindings spec that defines an implementation, including all of the attempts at defining bindings as being something other than resources, then what you will end up with is a very simple protocol for manipulating URI mappings on remote servers. Roy, quick question. What do you mean by "a binding is a resource"? That bindings and resources are one to one? If so, when we say that two bindings point to the same "thing", what is the word you'd like to use for "thing".
Received on Friday, 11 February 2000 17:57:02 UTC