- From: Greg Stein <gstein@lyra.org>
- Date: Thu, 27 Jan 2000 14:52:57 -0800 (PST)
- To: "Lisa Lippert (Dusseault)" <lisal@Exchange.Microsoft.com>
- cc: w3c-dist-auth@w3.org
Yes, it definitely has a place there. Somebody named Aengus was looking into this back into December, and was going to provide all the information (and a web page). Never got the info, though. I'll set up a page today or tomorrow and put the information that we have on it. Cheers, -g On Thu, 27 Jan 2000, Lisa Lippert (Dusseault) wrote: > Would this information be suitable on a page for the webdav.org site? Might > even put some pressure on proxy developers to support RFC 2518, and to allow > their administrators to name additional methods that should be allowed over > HTTP (e.g. so that new advanced collections or DASL commands can be added). > > Lisa > > -----Original Message----- > From: Joe Orton [mailto:joe@orton.demon.co.uk] > Sent: Thursday, January 27, 2000 5:10 AM > To: Lisa Lippert (Dusseault) > Cc: 'David Engberg'; w3c-dist-auth@w3.org > Subject: Re: WebDAV proxy problems > > > > I actually started collecting some information on this. Since I don't > have > > testing resources for it, it's only hearsay, but here goes: > > > > Known Proxies that support DAV > > > > - MS Proxy 2.0: Support for DAV is built-in to MS Proxy 2.0. > > - Squid: There is a patch for the Squid proxy server that adds support > for > > WebDAV (http://www.squid-cache.org/Versions/v2/2.2/bugs/). > > Apache mod_proxy works fine too. IIRC Squid 2.3 will pass through the > methods defined in 2518, but will still block methods it doesn't > understand. > > joe > -- Greg Stein, http://www.lyra.org/
Received on Thursday, 27 January 2000 17:53:01 UTC