RE: WebDAV proxy problems

Yes, it definitely has a place there. Somebody named Aengus was looking
into this back into December, and was going to provide all the information
(and a web page). Never got the info, though.

I'll set up a page today or tomorrow and put the information that we have
on it.

Cheers,
-g

On Thu, 27 Jan 2000, Lisa Lippert (Dusseault) wrote:

> Would this information be suitable on a page for the webdav.org site?  Might
> even put some pressure on proxy developers to support RFC 2518, and to allow
> their administrators to name additional methods that should be allowed over
> HTTP (e.g. so that new advanced collections or DASL commands can be added).
> 
> Lisa
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Joe Orton [mailto:joe@orton.demon.co.uk]
> Sent: Thursday, January 27, 2000 5:10 AM
> To: Lisa Lippert (Dusseault)
> Cc: 'David Engberg'; w3c-dist-auth@w3.org
> Subject: Re: WebDAV proxy problems
> 
> 
> > I actually started collecting some information on this.  Since I don't
> have
> > testing resources for it, it's only hearsay, but here goes:
> > 
> > Known Proxies that support DAV
> > 
> >  - MS Proxy 2.0: Support for DAV is built-in to MS Proxy 2.0.
> >  - Squid: There is a patch for the Squid proxy server that adds support
> for
> > WebDAV (http://www.squid-cache.org/Versions/v2/2.2/bugs/).
> 
> Apache mod_proxy works fine too. IIRC Squid 2.3 will pass through the
> methods defined in 2518, but will still block methods it doesn't
> understand. 
> 
> joe
> 

-- 
Greg Stein, http://www.lyra.org/

Received on Thursday, 27 January 2000 17:53:01 UTC