- From: Yaron Goland <yarong@Exchange.Microsoft.com>
- Date: Mon, 17 Jan 2000 12:05:27 -0800
- To: "'Jim Whitehead'" <ejw@ics.uci.edu>, w3c-dist-auth@w3.org
- Cc: Roy Fielding <fielding@ics.uci.edu>
Received on Monday, 17 January 2000 15:06:25 UTC
With all due respect, I think ALL of the 2616 authors should have a chance to respond as they all are indicted by your comments. -----Original Message----- From: Jim Whitehead [mailto:ejw@ics.uci.edu] Sent: Mon, January 17, 2000 11:26 AM To: w3c-dist-auth@w3.org Cc: Roy Fielding Subject: RE: WebDAV Bindings - Issue Yaron.Insulting2616 I currently have an email pending with Roy Fielding asking him about this issue. - Jim -----Original Message----- From: w3c-dist-auth-request@w3.org [mailto:w3c-dist-auth-request@w3.org]On Behalf Of Yaron Goland Sent: Monday, January 17, 2000 9:43 AM To: w3c-dist-auth@w3.org Subject: WebDAV Bindings - Issue Yaron.Insulting2616 The language used in the first paragraph of section 6 makes certain assertions regarding the intentions of the authors of RFC 2616 that I believe may not necessarily be accurate. As such I move that the authors of the BIND spec send an e-mail to all the authors of RFC 2616 and ask them to validate the accuracy of the proposed language.
Received on Monday, 17 January 2000 15:06:25 UTC