- From: Tim Ellison/OTT/OTI <Tim_Ellison@oti.com>
- Date: Fri, 28 Apr 2000 14:42:58 -0400
- To: Greg Stein <gstein@lyra.org>
- Cc: w3c-dist-auth@w3.org
This is true (see also http://andrew2.andrew.cmu.edu/rfc/rfc1738.html).
So this format is different to the MIME format called "application/
x-www-form-urlencoded", (ref.
http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-html40/interact/forms.html#h-17.13.4.1) and in
particular is different to the java.net.URLEncoder behaviour. This will
likely cause 'interesting' incompatibilities with many Java based clients.
Thanks for pointing this out.
Tim
Greg Stein
<gstein@lyra. To: Tim Ellison/OTT/OTI <Tim_Ellison@oti.com>
org> cc: w3c-dist-auth@w3.org
Subject: Re: Webfolders and URL encoding
28-04-00
02:12 PM
On Fri, 28 Apr 2000, Tim Ellison/OTT/OTI wrote:
> While we are on the subject of webfolders, can anyone provide insight as
to
> why WebFolders does not use '+' to encode the space character when doing
> URL encoding, and fails to recognise it on responses from the server?
>
> WebFolders appear to consistently use %20 for the space char, and don't
> decode '+' when one is returned.
'+' is not a valid encoding for 'space'. Some clients and servers do it
for parts of a URL (particularly within the 'query' section), but it is
not standard.
Refer to RFC 2396 (URLs) and RFC 2616 (HTTP), Section 3.2.
http://andrew2.andrew.cmu.edu/rfc/rfc2396.html
http://andrew2.andrew.cmu.edu/rfc/rfc2616.html
Cheers,
-g
--
Greg Stein, http://www.lyra.org/
Received on Friday, 28 April 2000 14:44:14 UTC