- From: Greg Stein <gstein@lyra.org>
- Date: Mon, 10 Apr 2000 14:36:50 -0700 (PDT)
- To: Juergen Reuter <reuterj@ira.uka.de>
- cc: jjh@ira.uka.de, w3c-dist-auth@w3.org
On Mon, 10 Apr 2000, Juergen Reuter wrote: > P.S.: > > However, the rule > > extend = Coded-URL > > should be fine, because the rule > > Coded-URL = "<" absoluteURI ">" > > implies that, as soon as you have encountered a "<", you can > accept as many "," as you find, belonging all to the absoluteURI, > until you finally reach a ">". (I suppose that is the reason why > people think that the brackets are needed. :-)) Exactly! All righty then... I'll resubmit my proposal: extend = "<" absoluteURI ">" For semantic purposes, I expanded Coded-URL since we will certainly have URI values in there (e.g. DAV:bindings) rather than URLs. In an If: header, the "URL" term makes sense. Back to my original point, then: does anybody see a problem if I updated mod_dav to use the following DAV: header: DAV: 1,2,<http://apache.org/dav/0.9.16> ?? Cheers, -g -- Greg Stein, http://www.lyra.org/
Received on Monday, 10 April 2000 17:31:11 UTC