- From: John Stracke <francis@ecal.com>
- Date: Mon, 27 Sep 1999 15:09:42 -0400
- To: WebDAV WG <w3c-dist-auth@w3.org>
I agree with Yaron. Having lots of alternatives sounds good, but so what? We had lots of alternatives to start with. :-) (telnet vs. FTP vs. FrontPage vs. Netscape content management extensions...). "Yaron Goland (Exchange)" wrote: > O.k. fine, don't allow the UI to support cross-server moves. Um... what > about single namespaces physically split between multiple services? You > know, http://foo/bar/ is on one machine but http://foo/ack is on another. > Ahh screw 'em. They have no business making namespaces like that visible to > the user or at least they should figure out how to connect them. For all my fellow MS-bashers out there: this sort of thought is not unique to MS. In fact, I don't think I've ever heard of any software company that couldn't have produced this monologue. :-) -- /=================================================================\ |John Stracke | http://www.ecal.com |My opinions are my own. | |Chief Scientist |================================================| |eCal Corp. |In the country of the blind, the one-eyed man is| |francis@ecal.com|in therapy. | \=================================================================/
Received on Monday, 27 September 1999 15:10:14 UTC