- From: Geoffrey M. Clemm <gclemm@tantalum.atria.com>
- Date: Wed, 15 Sep 1999 17:49:26 -0400
- To: w3c-dist-auth@w3.org
From: John Stracke <francis@ecal.com> "Slein, Judith A" wrote: > We think that it is not impossible to guarantee integrity of bindings even > in cases like this, if the server is willing to take enough trouble. It can > store a copy of the target resource locally, and insure that no changes are > allowed except when both servers are accessible. It may not be feasible to make a copy of a dynamic resource. <gmc/> True. In which case (as in all other cases where it cannot guarantee BIND semantics) the server has to fail the BIND request. Cheers, Geoff
Received on Wednesday, 15 September 1999 17:49:30 UTC