- From: Jim Whitehead <ejw@ics.uci.edu>
- Date: Wed, 25 Aug 1999 10:02:00 -0700
- To: WebDAV WG <w3c-dist-auth@w3.org>
Caught by the spam filter. - Jim -----Original Message----- From: Stig Bakken [mailto:ssb@fast.no] Sent: Wednesday, August 25, 1999 9:38 AM To: John Stracke Cc: w3c-dist-auth@w3.org Subject: [Moderator Action] Re: Mozilla editor and DAV On Wed, 25 Aug 1999, John Stracke wrote: > Christian Scholz wrote: > > > Wouldn't it make more sense if WebDAV functionality would be implemented > > in the underlying OS as then every application automatically would > > have access to it. > > No. Why would you want to bloat the OS with something that most > processes don't need? Now, a common library that apps can use easily, > that'd be different; but it certainly doesn't belong in the kernel. IMHO, WebDAV definitely has its place in a filesystem implementation. This won't bloat the OS (not modern ones, at least), and it provides a useful abstraction that requires little or no no extra work for application developers. - Stig
Received on Wednesday, 25 August 1999 13:09:16 UTC