- From: <ccjason@us.ibm.com>
- Date: Fri, 13 Aug 1999 22:18:36 -0400
- To: w3c-dist-auth@w3.org
Just another LOCK issue that I'm about to add to the list... A resource can only have one exclusive lock on it right? Well, what about if a principle locks (with depth) two trees of resources... but those two trees have some resources in common? That means those common resources would have two exclusive locks on them. Illegal, right? But the same principle owns both locks mind you. It would sure be nice to allow this... at least from this perspective. If we did not, it would sure be tedious to lock both trees. I haven't thought of the ramifications yet. J. ------------------------------------------ Phone: 914-784-7569, ccjason@us.ibm.com
Received on Friday, 13 August 1999 22:19:30 UTC