- From: Yaron Goland (Exchange) <yarong@Exchange.Microsoft.com>
- Date: Fri, 6 Aug 1999 10:11:20 -0700
- To: "'ccjason@us.ibm.com'" <ccjason@us.ibm.com>, w3c-dist-auth@w3.org
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-dist-auth/1997JulSep/0177.html is the actual letter that caused the WG to decide that locks were lost on moves. Yaron > -----Original Message----- > From: ccjason@us.ibm.com [mailto:ccjason@us.ibm.com] > Sent: Sun, July 25, 1999 7:58 AM > To: w3c-dist-auth@w3.org > Subject: Re: FW: [Moderator Action] Questions on Webdav > Servers, locking > > > > Geoff wrote... > > But a resource state lock acts very differently. If you delete a > > resource, the resource state lock should be deleted as well > (no state > > left to lock). This is what WebDAV says. But if you MOVE > a resource, > > you'd expect the resource state lock to remain in effect. But here > > WebDAV goes with the URL lock semantics and says that a MOVE deletes > > the lock. > > I sent a note a few months ago that brought up this and a few other > locking problems. I guess everyone was busy, because we didn't > address that note. Perhaps we should. > > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-dist-auth/1999AprJun/0246.html > >
Received on Friday, 6 August 1999 13:13:22 UTC