- From: Yaron Goland (Exchange) <yarong@Exchange.Microsoft.com>
- Date: Wed, 14 Jul 1999 02:15:53 -0700
- To: "'w3c-dist-auth@w3.org'" <w3c-dist-auth@w3.org>
I have now spent over four hours trying to dive through the advanced collection's spec. I have reached page 19, have 39 comments and numerous editorial changes. While this spec is enormously better than its predecessor there are still significant problems with the draft. The main problem is that it is really three extremely complex and very subtle drafts in one. As a reviewer being asked to go through what amount to three separate drafts all rolled into one is frustrating. I also believe it is inappropriate to ask the WG to chew on the sheer volume of material and ideas presented by the advanced collection draft at one time. Splitting the draft into three drafts (bind, MKREF and ordering) and then feeding the pieces linearly to the group so we can properly chew on them it would go a long way to ensuring that proper attention is given to the issues presented in these drafts while requiring a reasonable expenditure of effort on the part of the WG. Yaron
Received on Wednesday, 14 July 1999 05:17:26 UTC