- From: Yaron Goland (Exchange) <yarong@Exchange.Microsoft.com>
- Date: Sun, 11 Jul 1999 08:31:25 -0700
- To: "'Jim Whitehead'" <ejw@ics.uci.edu>, Jeff Baker <JBaker@novell.com>, w3c-dist-auth@w3.org
1. I will forward that bug. 2. Did you try to return a timeout value of infinity? 3. The BNF in section 6.4 allows for extension information. I don't think #3 is the problem since I think Office treats the lock token as a string. #2 sounds like the top contender to me. I would just change the response to include the timeout value and see if that works. If you have a netmon trace please send it to me. Also, if you have a server location I can test against that would also be useful. Yaron > -----Original Message----- > From: Jim Whitehead [mailto:ejw@ics.uci.edu] > Sent: Sunday, July 11, 1999 12:39 AM > To: Jeff Baker; w3c-dist-auth@w3.org > Subject: RE: [Moderator Action] LOCK and Office 2000 > > > > Nothing is immediately jumping to my mind. It might be > helpful if you could > post a protocol trace. Since you've tried to address these > problems and it > hasn't worked, perhaps the problem lies someplace else. > > - Jim > > > I'm having trouble getting Office 2000 to believe our Novell > > NetPublisher server when it says that a document is locked: I > > open a Web folder file and it always opens read-only. I've > > sniffed our response to the lock and compared it with Microsoft's > > (IIS 5 on Jim Whitehead's UCI machine). There are three differences: > > > > 1) Office 2000 doesn't specify a depth; the WebDAV spec says that > > "If no Depth header is submitted on a LOCK request then the > > request MUST act as if a "Depth:infinity" had been submitted." > > Because of this sentence in the spec, we return a lock of depth > > infinity; IIS 5 returns a lock of depth 0. > > > > 2) Office 2000 requests and receives a timeout of "Second-120" > > from IIS 5. Our server doesn't (yet) support timeouts, so we > > don't include a timeout XML element in the response. > > > > 3) The lock token from IIS 5 differs from tokens specified in the > > spec. One attempt to lock returned the token > > "opaquelocktoken:AA9F6414-1D77-11D3-B825-00105A989226:214748364853 > > " The decimal digits after the last colon are not defined in the > > UUID spec (ISO-11578) as far as I've been able to determine. > > > > I've tried changing the server code to more closely match IIS's > > response, in each of these three ways (depth, timeout, > > locktoken). In all three cases, Office 2000 still opened the file > > read-only. My gut says that case 3) above is what's causing the > > problem, but I don't know what it is that IIS puts, or what > > Office 200 wants, in this value. > > > > Does anybody have any information about this? > > > > jbaker@novell.com > > >
Received on Sunday, 11 July 1999 11:32:54 UTC