- From: james anderson <James.Anderson@mecomnet.de>
- Date: Tue, 12 Jan 1999 20:38:22 +0100
- To: WEBDAV?WG? <w3c-dist-auth@w3.org>
yes, i meant a "class hierarchy". John Stracke wrote: > > Jim Whitehead wrote: > > > > for > > > instance, is the intended hierarchy > > > collection > > > structured-document > > > directory > > > or is it > > > collection > > > structured-document > > > directory > > > ? > > > > I don't follow this, since my understanding of what is meant by structured > > document in the WebDAV sense isn't covered by these two cases. > > I think he means class heirarchy, not namespace heirarchy. My sense is that > the latter form is the correct class heirarchy.
Received on Tuesday, 12 January 1999 14:34:15 UTC