RE: Bug in WebDAV draft of April 1, 1998?

Well, I can't really call this a feature, so "bug" it is. :-)

The specification does have an error in the example in Section 7.1.2, and
should be fixed.

Thank you for catching this error, Alan!

- Jim

> -----Original Message-----
> From: w3c-dist-auth-request@w3.org
> [mailto:w3c-dist-auth-request@w3.org]On Behalf Of Babich, Alan
> Sent: Monday, September 28, 1998 3:12 PM
> To: 'webdav'
> Subject: Bug in WebDAV draft of April 1, 1998?
>
>
> This is the XML for the "supportedlock" property
> in the WebDAV draft of April7, 1998:
>
> <!ELEMENT supportedlock (lockentry)* >
> <!ELEMENT lockentry (lockscope, locktype)>
> <!ELEMENT lockscope (exclusive, shared)>
> <!ELEMENT exclusive EMPTY>
> <!ELEMENT shared EMPTY>
> <!ELEMENT locktype (write)>
> <!ELEMENT write EMPTY>
>
> In section 7.1.2 of the April 7, 1998 WebDAV draft,
> the example returns the following values for
> the "supportedlock" property of the two resources:
>
> <D:supportedlock>
>     <D:lockentry>
>         <D:exclusive/><D:write/>
>     </D:lockentry>
>     <D:lockentry>
>         <D:shared/><D:write/>
>     </D:lockentry>
> </D:supportedlock>
>
> (Both resources happen to have the same value
> for "supportedlock".)
>
> There was a typo, right? The value should have been:
>
> <D:supportedlock>
>     <D:lockentry>
>         <D:locokscope><D:exclusive/></D:lockscope>
>         <D:locktype><D:write/></D:locktype>
>     </D:lockentry>
>     <D:lockentry>
>         <D:lockscope><D:shared/></D:lockscope>
>         <D:locktype><D:write/></D:locktype>
>     </D:lockentry>
> </D:supportedlock>
>
> Right?
>
> Alan Babich
>

Received on Wednesday, 30 September 1998 15:18:51 UTC