WebDAV replies are never intended for direct human viewing, right? Is there a reason then that the WebDAV spec uses text/xml and does not even mention application/xml? It seems to me that the latter is closer to the intended use of WebDAV XML (as opposed to XML markup that's embedded in HTML). If this is right, the spec should say that a WebDAV server MUST accept both application/xml and text/xml, and MUST generate application/xml. Would this be good, aside from the fact that it would require change to some existing softwares? Jim ------------------------------------ http://www.parc.xerox.com/jdavis/ 650-812-4301Received on Monday, 27 July 1998 12:39:50 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 20:01:14 UTC