- From: Yaron Goland <yarong@microsoft.com>
- Date: Wed, 22 Jul 1998 11:51:38 -0700
- To: w3c-dist-auth@w3.org
The purpose of this post is to clarify some issues regarding the DAV Property/Message Object model. DAV message bodies and properties both share the same object model. That object model is NOT XML. Rather, XML is one of many possible transport formats for that object model. The message body/property object model is a tree. The root node MUST be an element. An element is a container which MUST have a URI for a name. An element MAY have an unlimited number of children. An element with an unrecognized name MUST be treated as if it and its children are not present in the tree unless the element's parent's definition instructs otherwise. A particular element's definition MAY require that signifigance be given to the ordering of the children. When an element is being transported, unless the transport has special knowledge of that element's definition, it MUST NOT change the order the children. An element may have one of two types of children, a byte stream or an element. In the absence of further information a byte stream MUST be interpreted as a Unicode string. Byte streams MUST be leaves in the tree. That's it. So when people ask questions like "Does a server have to return, byte for byte, the value that was submitted for a property" the answer is very clearly NO. All the server is required to do is to return the same object model. Even the requirement to return the same object model is abrogated in the case of live properties (which I address in a seperate post). So please don't get hung up on XML. It is just a transport format. We needed to require at least one for the sake of interoperability and XML fit the bill. I'm sure other formats will be defined in the future which may have nice properties for certain implementations. What we liked about XML was that it was a pretty good "One size fits all" type solution and thus seemed appropriate as the "you must at least support this" interoperability requirement. I hope that helps to clarify matters, Yaron
Received on Wednesday, 22 July 1998 14:51:24 UTC