- From: Larry Masinter <masinter@parc.xerox.com>
- Date: Mon, 2 Mar 1998 16:34:16 PST
- To: <w3c-dist-auth@w3.org>, "Jim Davis" <jdavis@parc.xerox.com>
It's always is a good idea to go into a BOF with explicit internet drafts. They're part of what the IESG looks at to see if the working group's charter is feasible and that there's a core of interest. The cutoff date is March 13 5 PM EST, but getting them in sooner than that is a very good idea. If the draft is "sketchy", just say so in the preface. -----Original Message----- From: Jim Davis <jdavis@parc.xerox.com> To: w3c-dist-auth@w3.org <w3c-dist-auth@w3.org> Date: Monday, March 02, 1998 2:37 PM Subject: internet drafts for next IETF? >Is there any advantage to the project (WebDAV or DASL) in having an >Internet Draft submitted soon (i.e. is there some cutoff date with regards >to the upcoming IETF such that IDs submitted before it will have either >some extra status at that meeting or will serve as evidence of useful >amounts of activity?). > >I seems to me that it's possible to write some drafts, though they might be >sketchy. Is 'sketchy' okay? I don't in the least claim that I would be >the rightful author, I just wanted to name them. > >* requirements for DASL >* requirements for external members/ordered collections >* DASL extensions > > > >
Received on Monday, 2 March 1998 19:34:36 UTC