- From: Yaron Goland <yarong@microsoft.com>
- Date: Sat, 24 Jan 1998 15:18:01 -0800
- To: "'Jim Davis'" <jdavis@parc.xerox.com>, w3c-dist-auth@w3.org
Please refer to section 10.1 of RFC 2068 for a full explanation of what 1xx series response codes are and how they work. It fully and completely answers your question. Yaron > -----Original Message----- > From: Jim Davis [SMTP:jdavis@parc.xerox.com] > Sent: Saturday, January 24, 1998 2:05 PM > To: w3c-dist-auth@w3.org > Subject: v6: 102 Processing and Status-URI > > Do we still need 102 Processing? Can *any* method return 102? or only > some? If only some, then those that can return it should list it the list > of possible status codes. If all can, then there should be some language > that says that the list of status codes with each DAV method is not > exhaustive. > > The explanation isn't sufficient to understand how 102 works. An example > would help. I mean, I can guess, and I might guess right, but I might > guess wrong, too. > > If I do e.g., a MOVE, and get back 102 Processing, will I eventually get a > MultiStatus? Will I get a stream of 102s every 20 seconds or so, until I > get that 207?
Received on Saturday, 24 January 1998 18:18:20 UTC