- From: Judith Slein <slein@wrc.xerox.com>
- Date: Wed, 10 Jun 1998 13:35:51 PDT
- To: w3c-dist-auth@w3.org
I see now that I didn't say anything in the Collection Protocol Spec about MOVE or COPY for collections that have referential members. Here's a proposal: To stay analogous with what was said in the base DAV spec, if the server cannot copy / move a referential member of a collection, it MUST NOT copy / move any members (internal or referential) of that collection. What about MOVE or COPY for an ordered collection? Can we specify that a server MUST fail a request to move an ordered collection to a location that does not comply with the ordered collections part of WebDAV? On the one hand, since clients can directly access and update the DAV:ordering property, it might still be valuable to move / copy the collection with its ordering, even though the ordering would be dead. On the other hand, it would be somewhat misleading for the DAV:ordering property to be present on a collection where the Position header is not supported, and the server does nothing to insure that each collection member appears in the ordering exactly once, etc. --Judy Name: Judith A. Slein E-Mail: slein@wrc.xerox.com Phone: (716) 422-5169 Fax: (716) 422-2938 Xerox Corporation Mail Stop 105-50C 800 Phillips Road Webster, NY 14580
Received on Wednesday, 10 June 1998 16:30:19 UTC