- From: Jim Davis <jdavis@parc.xerox.com>
- Date: Tue, 9 Jun 1998 15:02:24 PDT
- To: slein@wrc.xerox.com
- Cc: w3c-dist-auth@w3.org
This is the fifth (and, for today at least, final) message on the ID for advanced collection functions. It deals only with minor issues such as choice of names, editorial remarks, and mere typos in the ID. section 2, paragraph 3: perhaps change first occurence of "many" to "multiple". Why do some headers have names beginning with "Referential-" and others just "Ref-". I prefer the longer form 3.2 Here's one way to state the justification you need. The protocol extensions defined here use the extension mechanism specified in [Nielsen et al., 1998] "Mandatory Extensions in HTTP". Such an extension mechanism is needed because this draft defines additional headers for the HTTP PUT and WebDAV COPY and MOVE methods. Without such a mechanism, a client might invoke one of these methods on a server that does not understand the headers. Although RFC 2068 is silent on the point, it is common for servers to ignore headers they do not understand. In such a case, the method would appear to succeed, yet not have the intended effect. The Mandatory Extensions mechanism ensures that a server will fail on any message with headers that it does not understand. section 3.2 paragraph five. "refmember" should be "DAV:refmember" You should state (in 3.2) the name of the URI that defines the extention set you are defining. You use DAV:Coll-headers" in the example in 3.2 but examples should be illustrative not normative. section 3.3 typo: "has no affect" should be "effect" section 3.4 para 2 says: "If Depth = infinity in the PROPFIND request, the server SHOULD NOT follow references ..." I think, per requirement 3.1.4, that this should be MUST NOT, should SHOULD NOT section 3.5 para 1, 'refsource' should be 'DAV:refsource' section 4 , para 1. suggest adding to the sentence: Multiple orderings of the same resources can be achieved by creating multiple collections referencing those resources ^ as referential members section 6. Should document that all these properties (except perhaps ordering) are readonly, and that ordering is live, even if not read only.
Received on Tuesday, 9 June 1998 18:03:05 UTC