- From: Jim Davis <jdavis@parc.xerox.com>
- Date: Thu, 18 Dec 1997 09:34:57 PST
- To: ellis@crystaliz.com, w3c-dist-auth@w3.org
At 12:13 PM 12/17/97 PST, Ellis Cohen wrote: >.. I'd like to propose that we remove external >references from the current document.... >As far as I know, all of us who would like to see external >references in WebDav believe that they are most >useful if they are named and/or numbered. Speaking for myself only, I don't agree. I don't see the need for naming or numbering external members (as opposed to ordering *all* members, which I have argued for) and I also believe that external members are quite useful even without any naming or numbering at all. As evidence for the latter, there is a Xerox product called DocuShare which is a Web-based repository for documents. In the DocuShare model, a "collection" (they don't call them collections but that's okay) can store both external members (URLs) and internal members. There is no ordering or numbering. (Everything has a name, it's true, but DAV already provides a name in the form of the displayname property.) So I must respectfully deny your assertion. We need external members, and we don't need numbering. Removing external members would hurt, and I see nothing to gain by holding out for "numbered" external members.
Received on Thursday, 18 December 1997 13:18:58 UTC