W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-dist-auth@w3.org > October to December 1997

RE: proposal for ordered collections

From: Jim Whitehead <ejw@ics.uci.edu>
Date: Thu, 4 Dec 1997 13:47:22 -0800
Message-ID: <01BD00BB.2683D420.ejw@ics.uci.edu>
To: "'Jim Davis'" <jdavis@parc.xerox.com>, "w3c-dist-auth@w3.org" <w3c-dist-auth@w3.org>

Thank you for posting this proposal for ordered collection support in the 
WebDAV protocol.

While at first read, this proposal appears to adequately provide for 
ordered collections, I wonder about its hidden assumption: that one 
ordering for a collection is all you need.  I wonder whether it might be 
desirable to support multiple simultaneous orderings instead.

A brief sketch of how this could be accomplished is to have a predefined 
"ordering" property defined on a collection.  This property could then have 
multiple orderings defined within it.  A client which was interested in the 
ordering could read the "ordering" property, and then make use of one of 
the orderings in the property.  Each ordering could be supported by a 
different schema. Modifying the ordering is accomplished by modifying the 

An example "ordering" property is:

<?XML:NAMESPACE HREF="http://www.ietf.org/standards/dav/" AS="d"?>
<?XML:NAMESPACE HREF="http://www.ics.uci.edu/~ejw/davprop/" AS="j"?>
<?XML:NAMESPACE HREF="http://www.parc.xeroc.com/davprop/" AS="x"?>


This could also be accomplished using the RDF data model and XML 

- Jim

On Wednesday, December 03, 1997 11:05 PM, Jim Davis 
[SMTP:jdavis@parc.xerox.com] wrote:
> This is a proposal to modify WebDAV to include support for ordered
> collections.
> I have already stated the case for this feature elsewhere, and Jim
> Whitehead has neatly summarized it.  Moreover, I believe I have
> refuted all objections thus far raised to it without being (as yet)
> further rebutted.  I agreed to define the proposal more formally, and
> here I do so, although the credit for this definition more properly
> goes to Judy Slein, who did all the work, but as she was too busy to
> write it up, I am submitting it. Of course she should not be blamed
> for the errors I introduce here.
Received on Thursday, 4 December 1997 17:41:22 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 20:01:12 UTC