- From: Yaron Goland <yarong@microsoft.com>
- Date: Mon, 20 Oct 1997 17:55:48 -0700
- To: "'Dave Hollander'" <dmh@hpsgml.fc.hp.com>, w3c-dist-auth@w3.org
Wait, I already agreed! =) Yaron > -----Original Message----- > From: Dave Hollander [SMTP:dmh@hpsgml.fc.hp.com] > Sent: Monday, October 20, 1997 12:52 PM > To: w3c-dist-auth@w3.org > Subject: Re: minor questions and quibbles on V4 spec > > > Just a confirmation of David Durand's point. The namespace proposal > that we will be releasing for review this week does not support scoped > > values. You will need to explicitly use the namespace qualifier on > each element from that namespace. > > The other option is to experiment with application specific > conventions > about scoping. I would strongly suggest that you do not experiment > with something like the WEBDAV spec because it is likely that the > scoping > rules will be reexamined by the XML WG in a latter version. > > Regards, > > Dave Hollander > Co-author "Name Spaces in XML" > XML-WG > > > > David Durand wrote: > > > > This feature is also _not_ likely to be in XML. Final language has > not > > been approved on namespaces, but discussion has already led top > > general agreement that only _+fully_ qualified names will have > meaning > > in the 1.0 version of XML. It is not clear what, if any, defaulting > > rules are needed or possible to integrate with the rest of XML, and > so > > the minimization feature of scoping is not currently slated for > inclusion. > > > > The misunderstanding is very understandable, the original namespace > > proposal included minimization, and the version on the web may still > > do so, but that proposal was just one imput among many hundreds of > emails, > > and its unmodified form is not still under consideration. > > > > Given that one can already abbreviate the URI prefixes to a single > letter, > > I would hope that anyone writing XML would write fully qualified > names, and > > not rely on XML namespace scoping to make thier tags unambiguous. > > > > This will probably be the only standard practice for some time, > > although we hope that people will be experimenting with scoped > > solutions (and their interaction with DTDs) in order to provide > input > > to the XML process.
Received on Monday, 20 October 1997 20:57:30 UTC