- From: John Turner <johnt@cgocable.net>
- Date: Fri, 26 Sep 1997 16:10:28 +0600
- To: w3c-dist-auth@w3.org
I have a few questions and comments. Section 1.1.1, last paragraph. I agree, but there are cases where it does not make sense (i.e. the cgi example in the protocol document.) Would something like "SHOULD for the part of the namespace that it makes sense" be reasonable? Section 1.3.2 This seems to be a copy/paste error. The description belongs to another property. Section 1.4.8 Example What are the parameters on the IsCollection start tag in the Members element? Section 1.5.3 My understanding is that a PUT of a non-collection resource adds it to the namespace and also adds it as an internal member of the parent collection, assuming that the parent is a collection. Is this correct? If so, could this be said explicitly? Section 1.6.3.3 The paragraph references a conflict between between source and destination properties, but the next section (1.6.3.4) says that if the overwrite is set then it must DELETE the destination collection. I thought that if the overwrite was not set, that the copy would fail. This suggests that there can be no conflict between the properties. There also seems to be something wrong with the last couple of lines of text. Section 1.6.5.1 The overwrite header is missing on the first example. Or does it default to true? General Copy/Move question about non DAV space Should there be some comment to the effect that a MOVE or COPY on a non DAV part of the server has undefined results? John Turner johnt@cgocable.net
Received on Friday, 26 September 1997 16:23:17 UTC